HOME   |    PDF   |   


Title

Comparative analysis of different impression techniques in relation to single tooth impression

 

Authors

Aman Merchant, Subhabrata Maiti *, V. Ashok & Dhanraj M. Ganapathy

 

Affiliation

Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha institute of medical and technical science, Saveetha University Chennai, India

 

Email

Dr Subhabrata Maiti Email - subhabratamaiti.sdc@saveetha.com; Corresponding author*

 

Article Type

Research Article

 

Date

Received October 7, 2020; Revised October 27, 2020; Accepted October 27, 2020; Published December 31, 2020

 

Abstract

It is of interest to compare the accuracy of three different impression techniques for a single tooth impression. We used 3 groups with 15 samples each in this study. Group 1: Putty and light body in a sectional stock tray; Group 2: Monophase and extra light body in a sectional
stock tray; Group 3: Matrix impression technique. 15 impressions were taken of a prepared tooth on a typodont with each technique. The dimensions of the casts poured from these impression techniques were compared with the control typodont tooth. Data analysis shows that
the matrix impression technique gave the best results in terms of dimensional study followed by monophase and extra light body impression technique and putty and light body impression technique gave the least accurate results. The results show that there is a statistically significant difference between the three impression techniques in terms of dimensional stability. Data analysis shows that the matrix impression technique gave the best results in terms of dimensional study followed by monophase and extra light body impression technique and putty and light body impression technique gave the least accurate results. The variations between the groups are within acceptable limits. Hence, it can be concluded that all the impression techniques will result in adequate dimensional stability and can be used in clinical scenarios.

 

Keywords

Accuracy, Dimensional Stability, and Impressions

 

Citation

Merchant et al. Bioinformation 16(12): 1105-1110 (2020)

 

Edited by

P Kangueane

 

ISSN

0973-2063

 

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

 

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.