Title
Comparative evaluation of resiliency of mono-poly coated two different acrylic based tissue conditioners - An in vitro study
Authors
Apurva Kurhade1,*, Vidushi Jayaswal1, Mukesh Sisodiya1, Harsh Chansoria1, Alka Gupta1 & Shivani Gupta2
Affiliation
1Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India; 2Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Dental Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India; *Corresponding author
Apurva Kurhade - E-mail:
apurvakurhade01@gmail.com
Vidushi Jayaswal - E-mail: vidushijaiswal138@gmail.com
Mukesh Sisodiya - E-mail: sisodiyamukesh1295@gmail.com
Harsh Chansoria - E-mail: harsh.chansoria@gmail.com
Alka Gupta - E-mail: dr_alka2000@yahoo.com
Shivani Gupta - E-mail: shivani2231.g@gmail.com
Article Type
Research Article
Date
Received June 1, 2025; Revised June 30, 2025; Accepted June 30, 2025, Published June 30, 2025
Abstract
The resiliency of two monomer-coated acrylic-based tissue conditioners over 28 days is compared using an in vitro study. Sixty resin specimens were prepared and tested at five intervals using a durometer to measure viscoelastic properties. Initially, Orthoplast Acryton exhibited higher resiliency, but Maarc Soft Liner showed better performance from Day 7 onwards. Both materials demonstrated comparable resiliency after two weeks, suggesting stabilization over time. Mono-poly coating effectively preserved the softness and elasticity, supporting clinical use for short- to medium-term denture conditioning.
Keywords
Acrylic resin, artificial saliva, monopoly coating, resiliency, tissue conditioners
Citation
Kurhade et al. Bioinformation 21(6): 1775-1778 (2025)
Edited by
Ritik Kashwani
ISSN
0973-2063
Publisher
License
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
