HOME   |    PDF   |   


Title

Comparison of condylar inclination angle in edentulous subjects: CBCT versus protrusive interocclusal record

 

Authors

Priyanka Chopra1, Kavipal Singh1,*, Nimish Sethi1, Balwinder Singh2, Neelam Suman1 & Ramninder Bawa1

 

Affiliation

1Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Sri Amritsar, Punjab, India; 2Department of Oral Diagnosis, Oral Medicine & Radiology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute Of Dental Sciences and Research, Sri Amritsar, Punjab, India; *Corresponding author

 

Email

Priyanka Chopra - E-mail: priyankac.sales@gmail.com

Kavipal Singh - E-mail: drpriyanka.chopra86@gmail.com

Nimish Sethi - E-mail: nimishsethi@yahoo.co.in

Balwinder Singh - E-mail: dentalmanuscript@gmail.com

Neelam Suman - E-mail: docneelam5@yahoo.com

Ramninder Bawa - E-mail: ramninderbawa@gmail.com

 

Article Type

Research Article

 

Date

Received August 1, 2025; Revised August 31, 2025; Accepted August 31, 2025, Published August 31, 2025

 

Abstract

Horizontal condylar guidance angles obtained using two different methods: the clinical protrusive interocclusal record method and the radiographic method using CBCT (Cone Beam Computed Tomography). The key issue is the observed significant differences in the condylar guidance angles measured by the clinical method and those measured radiographically, with the radiographic measurements being consistently higher than the clinical ones. A total of 25 completely edentulous individuals were included, with condylar guidance angles measured clinically using the protrusive interocclusal record method and radiographically through CBCT in two formats. Results showed significant differences in the angles between the methods, with radiographic measurements being higher than clinical values. Strong correlations were observed between the clinical process and the CBCT panoramic and cross sectional views. The study concludes that CBCT measurements provide more precise condylar guidance angles than the protrusive interocclusal record method.

 

Keywords

CBCT, condylar guidance, cross-sectional view, panoramic view, protrusive interocclusal record

 

Citation

Chopra et al. Bioinformation 21(8): 2664-2668 (2025)

 

Edited by

Ritik Kashwani

 

ISSN

0973-2063

 

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

 

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.