Title |
A comparative evaluation of canal transportation and centering ability of 3 different rotary file systems in oval canals: An in vitro CBCT study
|
Authors |
Shreya Saurabh*, Deepak Kurup, Shazia Mahreen, Ramsha Rizwan, Garima Sinha & Sourav Tikadar
|
Affiliation |
Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Hazaribag College of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Harazibagh, Jharkhand, India; *Corresponding author
|
|
Shreya Saurabh - E-mail: shreya.saurabh2020@gmail.com
|
Article Type |
Research Article
|
Date |
Received August 1, 2025; Revised August 31, 2025; Accepted August 31, 2025, Published August 31, 2025
|
Abstract |
Achieving proper canal shaping in oval root canals is a significant challenge in endodontics, as anatomical variations often lead to procedural errors such as canal transportation and poor centering. Sixty extracted mandibular premolars with standardized root length and confirmed oval canals were randomly assigned into three groups (n=20 each) and instrumented according to manufacturer’s protocols. CBCT scans at 3 mm, 6 mm and 9 mm from the apex were analyzed for centering ratio and canal transportation, with results compared using one-way ANOVA (p<0.05). Hyflex CM demonstrated the best centering ability at 9 mm mesiodistally, Jizai showed the least transportation at the same level and One Curve performed better at 3 mm buccolingually. Thus, we show that rotary file systems differ in their ability to maintain canal anatomy and instrument selection plays a crucial role in achieving optimal root canal shaping. |
Keywords |
CBCT; canal transportation; centering ability; rotary NiTi files; oval canals
|
Citation |
Saurabh et al. Bioinformation 21(8): 2853-2856 (2025)
|
Edited by |
Hiroj Bagde
|
ISSN |
0973-2063
|
Publisher |
|
License |
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
|
|