HOME   |    PDF   |   


Title

Peri-implant bone loss in platform-switched versus conventional implants: A radiographic analysis

 

Authors

Prashant A. Karni1*, Ravindra Babu Lakkaraju2, Sachin Yadav3, Yasasvi Kalluri4, Mutthineni Ramesh Babu5, Prateek Tripathy6 & Rahul Tiwari7

 

Affiliation

1Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, KAHER’s KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India; 2Department of Dental Surgery, Government Medical College, Quthbullapur, Medchal-Malkajgiri, Telangana, India; 3Department of Dentistry, Government Medical College, Alwar, Rajasthan, India; 4Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Private Practitioner, Kakarla Dental Hospital, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India; 5Department of Periodontics, Mamata Dental College, Khammam, Telangana, India; 6Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hi-Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India; 7Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RKDF Dental College and Research Centre, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India; *Corresponding author

 

Email

Prashant A. Karni - E-mail: prashantkarni@yahoo.co.in
Ravindra Babu Lakkaraju - E-mail: ravindrababu.lakkaraju@gmail.com
Sachin Yadav - E-mail: doctorsachin41@gmail.com
Yasasvi Kalluri - E-mail: drkalluriyasasvi@gmail.com
Mutthineni Ramesh Babu - E-mail: rameshbabu297@gmail.com
Prateek Tripathy - E-mail: prk.tripathy55@gmail.com
Rahul Tiwari - E-mail: drrahulvctiwari@gmail.com

 

Article Type

Research Article

 

Date

Received September 1, 2025; Revised September 30, 2025; Accepted September 30, 2025, Published September 30, 2025

 

Abstract

Platform-switching (PS) reduces peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL) compared with conventional platform-matched (PM). Hence, we conducted a single-center retrospective radiographic study comparing 12-month MBL around PS and PM bone-level implants restored with fixed prostheses. Standardized periapical radiographs were calibrated to implant thread pitch and analyzed by blinded examiners. Among 128 implants (PS, n=64; PM, n=64), mean 12-month MBL was 0.28 ± 0.24 mm for PS vs 0.44 ± 0.31 mm for PM; the adjusted mean difference was -0.16 mm (95% CI -0.24 to -0.08; p=0.001). Thus, PS also showed a lower (non-significant) proportion with MBL ≥ 1.5 mm.

 

Keywords

Dental implants, dental implant-abutment design, alveolar bone loss, radiography, dental, retrospective studies

 

Citation

Karni et al. Bioinformation 21(9): 3249-3252 (2025)

 

Edited by

Akshaya Ojha

 

ISSN

0973-2063

 

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

 

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.