HOME   |    PDF   |   


Title

Assessing sagittal discrepancies using beta angle, ANB angle and WITS appraisal: A cephalometric study

 

Authors

Nakul Nandakishor Mude1, Amit Kumar2, Gazala Irfan3, Deepti Virupakshappa4,*, Rajashekhara Bharisharanesha5, Satwik Chatterjee6 & Ritik Kashwani7

 

Affiliation

1Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, ESIC Dental College and Hospital, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India; 2Department of Orthodontics, Muskan Dental Care, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India; 3Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Hazaribag College of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Hazaribag, Jharkhand, India; 4Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia; 5Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Abdul Aziz University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 6Department of Forensic Science, Adamas University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India; 7Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India; *Corresponding author

 

Email

Nakul Nandakishor Mude - E-mail: nakul12888@gmail.com
Amit Kumar - E-mail: dr_amitkumar1@yahoo.com
Gazala Irfan - E-mail: irfangazala95@gmail.com
Deepti Virupakshappa - E-mail: d.virupakshappa@psau.edu.sa
Rajashekhara Bharisharanesha - E-mail: r.bhari@psau.edu.sa
Satwik Chatterjee - E-mail: drsatwikc356@gmail.com
Ritik Kashwani - E-mail: docritikkashwani@yahoo.com

 

Article Type

Research Article

 

Date

Received October 1, 2025; Revised November 15, 2025; Accepted November 15, 2025, Published November 15, 2025

 

Abstract

There is a need to evaluate the reliability and applicability of various cephalometric tools used for assessing sagittal discrepancies in patients with Class I, II, and III skeletal patterns. Therefore, it is of interest to assess sagittal discrepancies in patients with Class I, II, and III skeletal patterns by comparing three common diagnostic tools: the beta angle, ANB angle, and Wits appraisal. Hence, a total of 120 subjects, divided into three groups based on their skeletal pattern, were evaluated using lateral cephalograms. Statistical analyses showed significant differences in beta angle measurements between the groups. The beta angle was found to provide a more consistent assessment of sagittal jaw relationships than the ANB angle and Wits appraisal, especially in cases with jaw rotations or occlusal plane changes. Thus, we show the beta angle as a valuable tool for orthodontic diagnosis, offering greater reliability in assessing skeletal relationships. Further research with larger samples and different populations is recommended to validate these findings.

 

Keywords

ANB angle, beta angle, cephalometry, skeletal discrepancies, Wits appraisal

 

Citation

Mude et al. Bioinformation 21(11): 4173-4178 (2025)

 

Edited by

P Kangueane

 

ISSN

0973-2063

 

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

 

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.