|
Title |
Software system for implant positioning with guided surgery: An in vivo study
|
|
Authors |
Shyni Rani Gorremutchu*, Sampath Anche, Krishna Mohan Thota & Nayeema Sultana
|
|
Affiliation |
Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge Including Implantology, SIBAR Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapdu, Guntur Andhra Pradesh 522509, India; *Corresponding author
|
|
|
Shyni Rani Gorremutchu - E-mail: shyni.rani025@gmail.com; Phone: +91
9908627527 Nayeema Sultana - E-mail: nayeemabds@gmail.com; Phone: +91 7680079797
|
|
Article Type |
Research Article
|
|
Date |
Received October 1, 2025; Revised November 15, 2025; Accepted November 15, 2025, Published November 15, 2025
|
|
Abstract |
Accurate implant positioning is critical for the long-term success of dental rehabilitation, yet variations among computer-guided surgery software systems can affect precision. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the accuracy of two implant planning software systems, Exocad and Blueskybio, in guided implant placement. A total of 104 implants were placed in 52 patients using fully guided templates, and postoperative CBCTs were analyzed for angular, depth, and horizontal deviations from preoperative plans. Software System A demonstrated significantly lower angular and linear deviations than Software System B, indicating superior positional accuracy. Thus, we show the importance of selecting precise planning software to ensure optimal implant placement and improved clinical outcomes. |
|
Keywords |
Implant positioning, guided surgery, accuracy, surgical guide, CBCT, software comparison, dental implants, in vivo study.
|
|
Citation |
Gorremutchu et al. Bioinformation 21(11): 4189-4193 (2025)
|
|
Edited by |
A Prashanth
|
|
ISSN |
0973-2063
|
|
Publisher |
|
|
License |
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
|
|
|
|