|
Title |
Efficacy of knotless barbed versus conventional sutures for uterine closure during cesarean section: A prospective comparative study
|
|
Authors |
Akanksha Lamba Thora1,*, Ankita Pawar1 & Anupama Dave2
|
|
Affiliation |
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MTH Hospital, Indore Madhya Pradesh, India; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MTH Women's Hospital, MGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India; *Corresponding author
|
|
|
Akanksha Lamba Thora - E-mail: dr.akanksha2709@gmail.com
Ankita Pawar - E-mail: ankitapawar131@gmail.com
|
|
Article Type |
Research Article
|
|
Date |
Received November 15, 2025; Revised December 15, 2025; Accepted December 15, 2025, Published December 15, 2025
|
|
Abstract |
Cesarean section is a typical surgical practice whereby a good uterine closure is essential for maternal outcomes. Conventional suturing involves knot-tying, which may take long and may weaken the integrity of tissues. This study involves a comparison between knotless barbed sutures (KBS) and the use of conventional sutures (CS) to close the uterus in case of cesarean delivery. In an 80-women prospective comparative trial, KBS decreased the uterine incision closure time (8.58 ± 1.18 min vs. 10.18 ± 1.81 min, p=0.002) and total closure time (27.77 ± 4.73 min vs. 30.95 ± 3.08 min, p=0.001) significantly. The extra hemostatic sutures required were significantly reduced in KBS (5% vs. 27.5, p=0.006). The thickness of the scar at 6 weeks (4.23 ± 0.90 mm vs. 3.54 ± 0.60 mm, p<0.001), was larger in the KBS. Knotless barbed sutures have considerable benefits on efficiency of operations, hemostasis and tissue healing of cesarean uterine closure. |
|
Keywords |
Cesarean section, Conventional suturing, knotless barbed sutures
|
|
Citation |
Thora et al. Bioinformation 21(12): 4929-4933 (2025)
|
|
Edited by |
Vini Mehta
|
|
ISSN |
0973-2063
|
|
Publisher |
|
|
License |
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
|
|
|
|