HOME   |    PDF   |   


Title

Comparative evaluation of marginal bone loss and prosthetic success in immediate versus delayed implant loading protocols: A radiographic study

 

Authors

Nakul Chaudhary1*, Chinmay Sharadchandra Dave2, Prachi Sharma3, R.V. Devisree4, Gunjan Gupta5 & Shailendra Pal Singh5

 

Affiliation

1Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College & Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India; 2Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India; 3Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India; 4Department of Periodontology, Azeezia College of Dental Sciences and Research, Kollam, Kerala, India; 5Department of Periodontology, Maharana Pratap College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India; *Corresponding author

 

Email

Nakul Chaudhary - E-mail: nakulchaudhary26@gmail.com
Chinmay Sharadchandra Dave - E-mail: csd765@gmail.com
Prachi Sharma - E-mail: drprachi.sh17@gmail.com
RV Devisree - E-mail: drdevisreenaveen@gmail.com
Gunjan Gupta - E-mail: drgunjan_arun@yahoo.co.in
Shailendra Pal Singh - E-mail: evolution.gwalior@gmail.com

 

Article Type

Research Article

 

Date

Received January 1, 2026; Revised January 31, 2026; Accepted January 31, 2026, Published January 31, 2026

 

Abstract

The comparison of the effects of immediate and delayed implant loading protocols on marginal bone loss and prosthetic success over a 12-month period is highly relevant. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the effects of immediate and delayed implant loading protocols on marginal bone loss and prosthetic success over 12 months. Hence, a total of 100 participants were randomly assigned to either the immediate or delayed loading group. Results showed that the delayed loading group experienced significantly less marginal bone loss and better bone preservation. Implant survival and prosthetic success rates were high in both groups, with no significant differences observed. Thus, we show that while immediate loading provides aesthetic advantages, delayed loading may offer better long-term bone preservation.

 

Keywords

Dental implants, immediate loading, marginal bone loss, prosthetic success

 

Citation

Chaudhary et al. Bioinformation 22(1): 42-46 (2026)

 

Edited by

Ritik Kashwani

 

ISSN

0973-2063

 

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

 

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.