|
Title |
Comparative analysis of clinical decision tools for acute pulmonary embolism at a tertiary care center
|
|
Authors |
Ashis Tiwari1, Sukh Dayal Kumhar1, Praveen Kumar Tagore1, Jitendra Kanjolia1,*, Shivani Parihar2 & Abha Bardiya3
|
|
Affiliation |
1Department of General Medicine, Government Medical College, Datia, Madhya Pradesh, India; 2Department of Pathology, Chirayu Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India; 3Department of Anaesthesiology, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India; *Corresponding author
|
|
|
Ashis Tiwari - E-mail: ashishtiwari.gwldr@gmail.com
|
|
Article Type |
Research Article
|
|
Date |
Received February 1, 2026; Revised February 28, 2026; Accepted February 28, 2026, Published February 28, 2026
|
|
Abstract |
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) requires accurate risk stratification to guide intensive care versus safe discharge decisions. Therefore, it is of interest to compare original Pneumonia Severity Index (PESI) versus Simplified Pneumonia Severity Index (sPESI) in 410 acute PE patients for predicting 30-day mortality and adverse outcomes. Both indices showed excellent negative predictive values (NPVs) (>98%) for mortality, with sPESI demonstrating higher sensitivity (94.1% vs 89.5%). Original PESI had slightly superior risk discrimination (AUC 0.78 vs 0.75), but sPESI proved more clinically practical. sPESI advances PE management as the preferred bedside tool for identifying low-risk patients suitable for outpatient care. |
|
Keywords |
Pulmonary embolism, risk stratification, PESI, sPESI, mortality prediction, clinical decision rules.
|
|
Citation |
Tiwari et al. Bioinformation 22(2): 754-758 (2026
|
|
Edited by |
Vini Mehta
|
|
ISSN |
0973-2063
|
|
Publisher |
|
|
License |
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
|
|
|
|