HOME   |    PDF   |   


Title

Comparative assessment of injectable platelet-rich fibrin versus concentrated growth factor for periodontal intrabony defects

 

Authors

Yasir S. Khan1, Rishiraj Singh Karki2, Tanu Sahney3, Shahrukh Khan3, Varanasi Haripriya4,* & Pritam Bora5

 

Affiliation

1Department of Periodontology, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India; 2Department of Dentistry, Government Doon Medical College and Hospital, Dehradun, India; 3Department of Periodontology, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences, Lucknow , Uttar Pradesh, India; 4Clinical Practioner, Sri Visweswara Dental Care and Implant Centre, Vishakhapatnam Andhra Pradesh, India; 5Department of Periodontology, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences, Lucknow , Uttar Pradesh, India; * Corresponding author

 

Email

Yasir S. Khan - E-mail: yasirk11@gmail.com
Rishiraj Singh Karki - E-mail: Drrishirajkarki@gmail.com
Tanu Sahney - E-mail: tanu.sahney910@gmail.com.
Shahrukh Khan - E-mail: shahrukhkhan107@gmail.com
Varanasi Haripriya - E-mail: varanasiharipriya95@gmail.com
Pritam Bora - E-mail: prtmbora@gmail.com

 

Article Type

Research Article

 

Date

Received February 1, 2026; Revised February 28, 2026; Accepted February 28, 2026, Published February 28, 2026

 

Abstract

Periodontal intrabony defects present a therapeutic challenge and direct clinical evidence comparing injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and concentrated growth factor (CGF) as regenerative materials remains limited. This randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial included 20 patients with 40 comparable three-wall intrabony defects treated by open flap debridement followed by either i-PRF or CGF, with clinical and radiographic parameters evaluated at baseline and 6 months. Both groups showed significant improvements in probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level and radiographic defect fill at 6 months (p<0.001). The CGF group demonstrated significantly greater pocket depth reduction, attachment gain and percentage of radiographic defect fill compared with the i-PRF group (p<0.05). Within the limitations of this study, both materials were effective, although CGF exhibited superior regenerative outcomes and may represent a more predictable option for periodontal intrabony defect regeneration.

 

Keywords

Periodontitis, intrabony defects, periodontal regeneration, injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF), concentrated growth factor (CGF), randomized controlled trial

 

Citation

Khan et al. Bioinformation 22(2): 824-828 (2026)

 

Edited by

Hiroj Bagde

 

ISSN

0973-2063

 

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

 

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.