Title

Osseointegration of implant with various surface treatments

Authors

Ashish Kalawat¹, Wael Mohamed Zakaria², GurleenKaur³, Pushkar Gupta^4,*, Swati Srivastava⁵, Anshul Chandra⁶ & Kondaveeti Viswaja⁷

Affiliation

¹Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Maharaja Ganga Singh Dental Collegeand Research Centre, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India; ²Department of Prosthodontic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Burayadh, Qassim 51452, Saudi Arabia; ³Intern, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Patia, Bhubaneswar-751024, Odisha, India; ⁴Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Hitkarini Dental College and Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India; ⁵Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Santosh Dental College, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India; ⁶Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Rama Dental College and Hospital, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India; ⁷Department of General Pathology, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai-600089, Tamil Nadu, India; *Corresponding author

Email

Ashish Kalawat - E-mail: drashishkalawat@gmail.com; Phone: +91 7447689543
Wael Mohamed Zakaria - E-mail: dr.wael.zakaria72@gmail.com; Phone: +917467687686
Gurleen Kaur - E-mail: gurleenbahia28@gmail.com; Phone: +917477688987
Pushkar Gupta - E-mail: drpushkar1@gmail.com; Phone: +91 7487685434
Swati Srivastava - E-mail: swat1302@gmail.com; Phone: +91 7247689434
Anshul Chandra - E-mail: atrueadmirer@gmail.com; Phone: +91 7247689223
Kondaveeti Viswaja - E-mail: drviswaja@gmail.com; Phone: +91 7247687334

Article Type

Research Article

Date

Received February 1, 2026; Revised February 28, 2026; Accepted February 28, 2026, Published February 28, 2026

Abstract

Osteointegration of dental implants is significantly influenced by surface treatment. The success of dental implants is largely dependent on osseointegration. Therefore, it is of interest to examine how four frequently applied surface treatments affected implant osseointegration. Based on the surface treatment used, standardized dental implants were split into four groups. Group I received a plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating; Group II received a titanium oxide nanocoating; Group III received a sandblast and acid etching; and Group IV received a UV light treatment. Following a nine-week simulated healing period under controlled settings, implants were placed in bovine bone blocks. Then they were subjected to biomechanical testing. Superior outcomes were shown by plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite, sandblasted, acid-etched and titanium oxide nano coating group.

Keywords

Implant, success, surface treatment

Citation

Kalawat et al. Bioinformation 22(2): 865-868 (2026)

Edited by

P Babaji

ISSN

0973-2063

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.