|
Title |
Mortality comparison in acute myocardial infarction patients according to presence versus absence of traditional modifiable cardiovascular risk factors
|
|
Authors |
Jitendra Kanjolia1, Ashis Tiwari1, Sukh Dayal Kumhar1, Praveen Kumar Tagore1,*, Shivani Parihar2 & Abha Bardiya3
|
|
Affiliation |
1Department of General Medicine, Government Medical college, Datia, Madhya Pradesh, India; 2Department of Pathology, Chirayu Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India; 3Department of Anaesthesiology, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India; *Corresponding author
|
|
|
Jitendra Kanjolia - E-mail: jitendrakanjolia@gmail.com
|
|
Article Type |
Research Article
|
|
Date |
Received February 1, 2026; Revised February 28, 2026; Accepted February 28, 2026, Published February 28, 2026
|
|
Abstract |
Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) like hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and smoking strongly predict AMI, yet many patients lack these. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 580 consecutive Type 1 AMI admissions, stratifying into SMuRF-less (0 factors) versus those with ≥1 SMuRF. SMuRF-less patients showed significantly higher in-hospital mortality (10.9% vs. 5.2%, p=0.03). They also exhibited increased cardiogenic shock frequency compared to the SMuRF-present group. SMuRF-less AMI advances understanding by revealing paradoxical mortality risk, necessitating expanded screening beyond traditional factors. |
|
Keywords |
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI), SMuRFs, mortality, risk factor paradox, cardiogenic shock.
|
|
Citation |
Kanjolia et al. Bioinformation 22(2): 917-921 (2026)
|
|
Edited by |
Vini Mehta
|
|
ISSN |
0973-2063
|
|
Publisher |
|
|
License |
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
|
|
|
|