|
Title |
Comparison of piezoelectric surgery versus conventional methods for benign odontogenic jaw cysts tumours
|
|
Authors |
Subham Mahapatra*, Abhishek Balani, Vinay Kharsan, Abhishek Karan, Swati Sahu & Mansi Dubey
|
|
Affiliation |
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, New Horizon Dental College and Research Institute, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India; *Corresponding Author
|
|
|
Subham Mahapatra - E-mail:
msubham0808@gmail.com; Phone: +91 98274 63197
|
|
Article Type |
Research Article
|
|
Date |
Received February 1, 2026; Revised February 28, 2026; Accepted February 28, 2026, Published February 28, 2026
|
|
Abstract |
Surgery for benign odontogenic jaw cysts and tumors demands precise bones cutting with vital structure preservation, yet piezoelectric versus rotary instrument comparisons are scarce. This prospective RCT evaluated outcomes, intraoperative factors, and recovery in 94 patients with odontogenic lesions randomized to piezoelectric (n=47) or rotary (n=47) surgery. Piezoelectric surgery cut intraoperative bleeding (98.4±32.6 mL versus 186.2±48.4 mL, p<0.001), boosted neurosensory preservation (95.7% versus 78.7%, p=0.018), and improved pain and bone healing despite longer times. Postoperative swelling dropped significantly with piezoelectric use, while recurrence rates matched between groups. Piezoelectric surgery excels in soft tissue protection, bleeding control, and healing, positioning it as the superior choice over rotary methods for odontogenic lesions. |
|
Keywords |
Piezoelectric surgery, odontogenic cysts, odontogenic tumours, jaw surgery, bone cutting, ultrasonic osteotomy
|
|
Citation |
Mahapatra et al. Bioinformation 22(2): 1039-1045 (2026)
|
|
Edited by |
Vini Mehta
|
|
ISSN |
0973-2063
|
|
Publisher |
|
|
License |
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
|
|
|
|