|
Title |
Reconstruction plates versus single or dual miniplates for angle fractures: Hardware failure and non-union rates
|
|
Authors |
Mansi Dubey*, Abhishek Balani, Vinay Kharsan, Abhishek Karan, Swati Sahu & Subham Mahapatra
|
|
Affiliation |
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, New Horizon Dental College and Research Institute, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India; *Corresponding author
|
|
|
Mansi Dubey - E-mail:
mansidubey59@gmail.com; Phone: +91 98930 78115
|
|
Article Type |
Research Article
|
|
Date |
Received February 1, 2026; Revised February 28, 2026; Accepted February 28, 2026, Published February 28, 2026
|
|
Abstract |
Mandibular angle fractures remain common in facial trauma, yet optimal fixation methods remain controversial due to variable hardware failure and non-union rates. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate reconstruction plates (n=58), single miniplates (n=64) and dual miniplates (n=64) in 186 patients over 5 years with ≥12-month follow-up. Outcomes assessed included hardware failure, non-union, infection and malocclusion across all groups. Reconstruction plates demonstrated superior results with the lowest hardware failure (3.4%) and non-union (1.7%) rates versus single miniplates (12.5%, 6.3%) and dual miniplates (6.3%, 3.1%) (p<0.05). Reconstruction plates provide optimal biomechanical stability for complex mandibular angle fractures, particularly with unfavourable patterns, inadequate dentition, or poor patient compliance. |
|
Keywords |
Mandibular angle fracture, reconstruction plates, miniplates, hardware failure, non-union, osteosynthesis
|
|
Citation |
Dubey et al. Bioinformation 22(2): 1250-1255 (2026)
|
|
Edited by |
Vini Mehta
|
|
ISSN |
0973-2063
|
|
Publisher |
|
|
License |
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
|
|
|
|