|
Title |
Artificial intelligence improves radiologist workflow and assessment of image quality accuracy
|
|
Authors |
Rishabh Yadav1, Mukesh Kumar2, Ifath Nazia Ghori3, Abhijeet Alok4, Amrita Pandita Bhatia5,*, Santosh Kumar Kotnoor6 & Rahul Tiwari7
|
|
Affiliation |
1Department of Radiology, Prasad Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India; 2Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Shree Bankey Bihari Dental College, Masuri, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India; 3Department of Computer Science, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia; 4Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sarjug Dental College and Hospital, Darbhanga, Bihar, India; 5Department of Prosthodontics (Crown and Bridges and Implantology), YCCM and RDF’s Dental College and Hospital, Ahilyanagar, Maharashtra, India; 6Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, HKES S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Science and Research, Kalaburgi, Karnataka, India; 7Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, Gujarat, India; *Corresponding author
|
|
|
Rishabh Yadav - E-mail: drrishabh.always@gmail.com Mukesh Kumar - E-mail: kumardrmukesh@gmail.com Ifath Nazia Ghori - E-mail: ighori@jazanu.edu.sa
Abhijeet Alok - E-mail: drabhijeetalok786@gmail.com Santosh Kumar Kotnoor - E-mail: santoshvevaan@gmail.com Rahul Tiwari - E-mail: rtcfsurgeon@gmail.com
|
|
Article Type |
Research Article
|
|
Date |
Received March 1, 2026; Revised March 31, 2026; Accepted March 31, 2026, Published March 31, 2026
|
|
Abstract |
Increasing imaging volumes and workflow pressures make consistent image quality assessment (IQA) challenging for radiologists in routine clinical practice. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have recently been introduced to support quality control tasks, yet real-world evidence on their impact on radiologist workflow and diagnostic performance remains limited. Therefore, it is of interest to assess the effect of AI-IQA module of PACS/worklist on radiological workflow and accuracy in identifying suboptimal CT/MRI tests. Workflow (IQA time, TTFR and TAT) and IQA performance (sensitivity, specificity, kappa) metrics were evaluated in two groups (before and after 8 weeks of AI integration) and compared to an expert reference standard. AI integration lowered median IQA task time/examination and improved report turnaround time and improved radiologist sensitivity to suboptimal IQA without affecting specificity. Thus, we show AI-assisted IQA as a scalable tool to enhance the quality control and operation performance in the routine clinical practice. |
|
Keywords |
Artificial intelligence (AI); radiology workflow; image quality assessment (IQA); picture archiving and communication system (PACS) integration; turnaround time
|
|
Citation |
Yadav et al. Bioinformation 22(3): 1322-1325 (2026)
|
|
Edited by |
Vini Mehta
|
|
ISSN |
0973-2063
|
|
Publisher |
|
|
License |
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
|
|
|
|