HOME   |    PDF   |   


Title

Unveiling the landscape of robotic surgery: insights into Indian medical perspectives

 

Authors

Vinayak J Shenage1,*, Harshal A Chohatkar1, Nitin M. Baste1, Sanjay P Dhangar2,* & Aishwarya Patil3

 

Affiliation

1Department of General Surgery, SMBT IMSRC, Dhamangaon, Ghoti, Igatpuri, Nashik, Maharashtra, India; 2Department of Urology, Bharati Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India; 3Department of Surgery, SMBT IMS & RC, Nashik, Maharashtra, India; *Corresponding author

 

Email

Vinayak J Shenage - E-mail: drvinayakshenage@yahoo.com
Harshal A Chohotkar - E-mail: harshal.9019@gmail.com
Nitin M Baste - E-mail: nitinbaste@gmail.com
⁠Sanjay P Dhangar - E-mail: drspdhangar@gmail.com
Aishwarya Patil - E-mail: aishudpatil21@gmail.com

 

Article Type

Research Article

 

Date

Received March 1, 2026; Revised March 31, 2026; Accepted March 31, 2026, Published March 31, 2026

 

Abstract

Limited and variable acceptance of robotic surgery among Indian healthcare providers remains a key challenge for its effective clinical integration. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate doctors’ demographics, knowledge of robotic surgery and perceptions regarding adoption, benefits, drawbacks and future trends. Considerable proportions were uncertain about India’s readiness for robotic surgery to replace conventional procedures, although 43.2% believed it may replace laparoscopic surgery in the future. Major concerns included high costs and infrastructure requirements, yet 51.1% expected robotic surgery to become more widespread in India within the next 5-10 years.

 

Keywords

Robotic surgery, India, doctors' perceptions, adoption, minimally invasive surgery, healthcare technology

 

Citation

Shenage et al. Bioinformation 22(3): 1462-1468 (2026)

 

Edited by

Ritik Kashwani

 

ISSN

0973-2063

 

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

 

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.