|
Title |
Comparative evaluation between guided endodontics and conventional technique: A prospective clinical study
|
|
Authors |
Vaibhav Sharma1, Pranjali Dutt2, Endla Varun Kumar3, Shalaka Raurale4, Tanvi Saraf5,*, Apoorva Sharma1 & Miral Mehta6
|
|
Affiliation |
1Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Shri Balaji Institute of Dental Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India; 2Department of Dentistry, Mahamaya Rajkiya Allopathic Medical College, Ambedkarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India; 3Department of Dentistry, Maharaja's Institute of Medical Sciences, Nellimarla, Vizianagaram, India; 4Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Dr. N. Y. Tasgaonkar institute of medical science and Research Center, Diksal, Karjat, India; 5Department of pediatric and preventive dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth (deemed to be university) dental college and hospital, Navi Mumbai, India; 6Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India; *Corresponding author
|
|
|
Vaibhav Sharma - E-mail: drvaibhavsharma1986@gmail.com; Phone: +91 76975 24999 Pranjali Dutt - E-mail: duttpranjali@gmail.com Endla Varun Kumar - E-mail: evarunomfs@gmail.com; Phone: +91 9030693816 Shalaka Raurale - E-mail: shalaka.raurale@gmail.com; Phone: +91 90046 05274 Tanvi Saraf - E-mail: drsaraftanvi@gmail.com; Phone: +91 9819114395 Apoorva Sharma - E-mail: drapoorva03@gmail.com; Phone: +91 7746969260 Miral Mehta - E-mail: miral9829@gmail.com; Phone: +91 94277 04737
|
|
Article Type |
Research Article
|
|
Date |
Received April 1, 2026; Revised April 30,
2026; Accepted April 30, 2026, Published April 30, 2026 |
|
Abstract |
Calcified root canals challenge endodontic success through procedural errors, excessive dentin loss and treatment failure when managed conventionally. Therefore, it is of interest to compare guided endodontics versus freehand technique in 60 teeth (48 patients) with pulp canal obliteration (n=30/group). Guided endodontics achieved superior canal location (96.7% versus 73.3%), reduced negotiation time, minimized dentin removal and lowered procedural complications (perforation/ledge/instrument separation). Patient-reported outcomes favored guided endodontics at 1 week and 3 months, with less post-operative pain and higher satisfaction. This data helps to guide endodontics for precise, minimally invasive standard in treating calcified canals, thereby transforming the management of historically problematic cases. |
|
Keywords |
Guided endodontics, pulp canal obliteration, calcified canals, 3D-printed guide, conventional endodontics, minimally invasive
|
|
Citation |
Sharma et al. Bioinformation 22(4): 2353-2359 (2026)
|
|
Edited by |
Vini Mehta
|
|
ISSN |
0973-2063
|
|
Publisher |
|
|
License |
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
|
|
|
|