HOME   |    PDF   |   


Title

Clinical assessment versus radiological investigations: Predictive accuracy for intra abdominal injury after blunt trauma

 

Authors

Dheeraj Kain1, Vishal Patil1,*, Nitin Patta2, Rishi Kumar Athya2, Richali Gujare3, Akansha Sahare4 & Sachin Parmar5

 

Affiliation

1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Bhopal Memorial Hospital and Research centre Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India; 2Department of Surgical Oncology Bhopal Memorial Hospital and Research centre Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India; 3Department of General Surgery, Shri Aurobindo Institute of medical sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India; 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mahaveer Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India; 5Department V.K.S. Government Medical College, Neemuch, Madhya Pradesh, India; *Corresponding author

 

Email

Dheeraj Kain - E-mail: kaindheeraj.555@gmail.com

Vishal Patil - E-mail: vishal18patil@gmail.com

Nitin Patta - E-mail: nitin.patta@gmail.com

Rishi Kumar Athya - E-mail: rishi.athya@gmail.com

Richali Gujare - E-mail: Rgujare2410@gmail.com

Akansha Sahare - E-mail: akanshasahare13@gmail.com

Sachin Parmar - E-mail: dr.sachinparmar@gmail.com

 

Article Type

Research Article

 

Date

Received April 1, 2026; Revised April 30, 2026; Accepted April 30, 2026, Published April 30, 2026
 

Abstract

Blunt abdominal trauma remains a critical biomedical problem because clinical examination alone has limited sensitivity and negative predictive value for detecting intra-abdominal injuries in hemodynamically stable patients. Therefore, it is of interest to measure the clinical assessment of the diagnostic value of radiological versus clinical investigation with 100 patients with blunt abdominal trauma aged between 20-60 years in a tertiary care center in Rewa, India (April 2021- June 2022). Most prevalent was road traffic accidents (50%), followed by spleen (25%), clinical signs were pain (98%) and tenderness (90%), with the USG/X-ray (100%) and CECT (60%) leading to 70% conservative treatment with 94% good and 6% death. Thus, the radiological imaging proved to be a better diagnostic tool than clinical assessment of intra-abdominal injuries.

 

Keywords

Blunt abdominal trauma, clinical assessment, FAST ultrasound

 

Citation

Kain et al. Bioinformation 22(4): 2675-2679 (2026)

 

Edited by

P Kangueane

 

ISSN

0973-2063

 

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

 

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.