HOME   |    PDF   |   


Title

Effectiveness of blended learning versus conventional didactic teaching in pathology education outcomes

 

Authors

Puja Singh*, Jyoti Namdev & Jyoti Shukla

 

Affiliation

Department of Pathology, Bundelkhand Medical College, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India; *Corresponding author

 

Email

Puja Singh - E-mail: dr.pujasingh@gmail.com

Jyoti Namdev - E-mail: nam.dev.j147@gmail.com

Jyoti Shukla - E-mail: jyotishukla751991@gmail.com

 

Article Type

Research Article

 

Date

Received June 1, 2026; Revised June 30, 2026; Accepted June 30, 2026, Published June 30, 2026

 

Abstract

Traditional didactic lectures in pathology often promote passive learning, limiting students' ability to apply knowledge clinically. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the learner outcomes between blended learning and traditional didactic lectures among 110 second-year MBBS students. The blended learning group demonstrated significantly superior performance in application-based scores (mean difference 4.5, p<0.001, d=1.85), total examination scores (difference 5.5, p<0.001, d=1.48) and all learner engagement domains (p<0.001) with large effect sizes. Student satisfaction was also markedly higher with blended learning (4.32±0.51 versus 3.48±0.62, p<0.001). Thus, data shows the blended learning enhances higher-order cognitive skills, engagement and satisfaction into competency-based medical curricula for pathology education.

 

Keywords

Blended learning, teaching-learning methods, medical education, learner engagement and competency-based medical education (CBME)

 

Citation

Singh et al. Bioinformation 22(6): 3781-3785 (2026)

 

Edited by

P Kangueane  

 

ISSN

0973-2063

 

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

 

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.