HOME   |    PDF   |   


Title

Non-clinical determinants predicting implant longevity: Model development and validation

 

Authors

R. Antony Jebaraj1, Surya Singh2, Richa Acharya2, Dhanashree Kamble3, Shubham Shegokar4, Priti P. Shah5 & Nancy Jidiya5,*

 

Affiliation

1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rajas Dental College and Hospital, Kavalkinaru, Tirunelveli, India; 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dental Science and Research Centre, Bopal, Gujarat, India; 3Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Nanded Rural Dental College and Research Center, India; 4Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Nanded Rural Dental College and Research Centre, India; 5Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Faculty of Dental Science, Nadiad, Gujarat, India; *Corresponding author

 

Email

R. Antony Jebaraj - E-mail: drantonyjebaraj@gmail.com

Surya Singh - E-mail: singhsurya794@gmail.com

Richa Acharya - E-mail: richa.acharya18@gmail.com

Dhanashree Kamble - E-mail: dhanashreekamble.dk@gmail.com

Shubham Shegokar - E-mail: drshubhamshegokar24@gmail.com

Priti P. Shah - E-mail: pritishah.fods@ddu.ac.in

Nancy Jidiya - E-mail: nancygediya30@gmail.com

 

Article Type

Research Article

 

Date

Received July 1, 2026; Revised July 31, 2026; Accepted July 31, 2026, Published July 31, 2026

 

Abstract

Accurate prediction of dental implant longevity remains difficult using readily available non-clinical patient factors alone. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the internally validated 5-year implant longevity models using demographic, systemic and behavioural and maintenance variables from 864 implants in 326 patients. Logistic Regression, Random Forest and Gradient Boosting Machine models were assessed using AUC, Brier score, calibration and decision-curve analysis. The 5-year failure rate was 18.2% and Gradient Boosting Machine showed the best performance with an AUC of 0.64 and Brier score of 0.179. Thus, data shows the non-clinical variables provide moderate predictive accuracy and may support early risk stratification and future multimodal prediction models.

 

Keywords

Dental implants, longevity, machine learning (ML), risk prediction, behavioral factors, modelling

 

Citation

Jebaraj et al. Bioinformation 22(7): 4060-4070 (2026)

 

Edited by

Hiroj Bagde  

 

ISSN

0973-2063

 

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

 

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.