HOME   |    PDF   |   


Title

AI versus conventional methods for predicting implant stability using simulated bone models: An in vitro study

 

Authors

Aditi Bhatnagar1, Mrinalini Agarwal2, Tehseen Desai3, Tarang Mehta4,*, Gunjan Gupta5 & Shivendra Rajput5

 

Affiliation

1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Gandhinagar, India; 2Department of Periodontology & Implantology, Maharana, Pratap College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India; 3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yogita Dental College and Hospital, Khed, Maharashtra, India; 4Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology and Oral Microbiology, K M Shah Dental College & Hospital Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Vadodara, Gujarat, India; 5Department of Periodontology, Maharana Pratap college of Dentistry and Research Centre, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India; *Corresponding author

 

Email

Aditi Bhatnagar - E-mail: tre_2@yahoo.co.in

Mrinalini Agarwal - E-mail: mrinaliniagarwal1@gmail.com

Tehseen Desai - E-mail: tehseen7218@gmail.com

Tarang Mehta - E-mail: tarangmehta111@gmail.com

Gunjan Gupta - E-mail: drgunjan_arun@yahoo.co.in

Shivendra Rajput - E-mail: shivendra23rajput@gmail.com

 

Article Type

Research Article

 

Date

Received July 1, 2026; Revised July 31, 2026; Accepted July 31, 2026, Published July 31, 2026

 

Abstract

Accurate prediction of primary implant stability remains challenging because conventional chairside methods may provide inconsistent results when used individually. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the AI-based multimodal model with insertion torque, resonance frequency analysis and Periotest measurements in 120 implants placed in D2, D3 and D4 simulated bone blocks. Peak pull-out resistance and cyclic displacement served as reference standards following standardized vertical and oblique loading. The AI model achieved higher accuracy (91.7% vs. 77.8%) and lower prediction error (RMSE 3.8 vs. 7.1), with the greatest improvement in low-density bone models (p<0.001). Thus, data shows that multimodal AI prediction may provide a more objective estimate of implant stability and support pre-loading decisions following clinical validation.

 

Keywords

Artificial intelligence (AI), dental implant, implant stability, resonance frequency analysis, insertion torque, in vitro study

 

Citation

Bhatnagar et al. Bioinformation 22(7): 4159-4164 (2026)

 

Edited by

Hiroj Bagde

 

ISSN

0973-2063

 

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

 

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.