HOME   |    PDF   |   


Title

Efficiency evaluation of different activation methods on dentinal tubule penetration by a bioactive glass-based sealer using confocal laser scanning microscopy: An in vitro study

 

Authors

Rupali Priyadarshi, Sanjeev Srivastava*, Arohan Singh, Saraswati Sachan & Prachi Jha

 

Affiliation

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India; *Corresponding author

 

Email

Rupali Priyadarshi - E-mail: priyadarshi.rupali@gmail.com
Sanjeev Srivastava - E-mail: sanjeevsrivastava409@gmail.com
Arohan Singh - E-mail: arohansingh@gmail.com
Saraswati Sachan - E-mail: saraswatisachan90@gmail.com
Prachi Jha - E-mail: prachijha1996@gmail.com

 

Article Type

Research Article

 

Date

Received August 1, 2026; Revised August 31, 2026; Accepted August 31, 2026, Published August 31, 2026

 

Abstract

Dentinal tubule penetration of bioactive glass-based sealers is influenced by the activation technique used during obturation. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the ultrasonic, sonic, lentulospiral and manual activation methods for dentinal tubule penetration of a bioactive glass-based sealer using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Sixty extracted mandibular premolars were prepared, obturated after sealer activation (n=15/group) and evaluated at coronal, middle and apical thirds using CLSM. Ultrasonic activation produced the greatest penetration at all root levels (322.58±4.34, 295.74±4.37 and 197.42±4.22 μm), followed by sonic (291.02 μm ,250.55 μm and 179.69 μm), lentulospiral (265.75 μm, 213.77 μm and 145.21 μm) and manual (155.47 μm, 114.03 μm and 95.70 μm) activation, with significant intergroup differences (P<0.001). Thus, data shows that ultrasonic activation significantly enhances dentinal tubule penetration of bioactive glass-based sealer and may improve obturation quality compared with conventional techniques.

 

Keywords

Bioactive glass–based sealer; dentinal tubule penetration; ultrasonic activation; sonic activation; lentulospiral; confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)

 

Citation

Priyadarshi et al. Bioinformation 22(8): 5109-5114 (2026)

 

Edited by

Vini Mehta

 

ISSN

0973-2063

 

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

 

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.