|
Title |
Retreatment time, efficacy and cleaning ability: Hand versus four rotary devices for gutta-percha removal in single-rooted teeth
|
|
Authors |
Uge Anushri Arvind*, Rana K. Varghese, Naveen Kumar Gupta, Chandrabhan Gendley, Purvi Vishwakarma & Lavina Chawla
|
|
Affiliation |
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, New Horizon Dental College and Research Institute, Sakri, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India; *Corresponding author
|
|
|
Uge Anushri Arvind - E-mail: anushriuge34@gmail.com; Phone: +91
9637927811
|
|
Article Type |
Research Article
|
|
Date |
Received August 1, 2026; Revised August 31, 2026; Accepted August 31, 2026, Published August 31, 2026
|
|
Abstract |
Endodontic retreatment aims to remove root canal filling material and facilitate effective canal re-cleaning and disinfection. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the manual Hedstrom files with four rotary retreatment systems in 75 extracted single-rooted teeth. Rotary systems significantly reduced procedural time, with the HyFlex™ retreatment system demonstrating the fastest gutta-percha removal. HyFlex™ also left the least residual debris, while Hedstrom files showed the highest debris, particularly in the apical third. Thus, rotary retreatment systems, especially HyFlex™, provide superior efficiency and cleaning ability, although additional measures may be required for complete canal cleanliness. |
|
Keywords |
Endodontic retreatment, gutta-percha removal, rotary files, Hedstrom files, cleaning ability, proTaper retreatment, NeoEndo, HyFlexTM, R-Endo.
|
|
Citation |
Arvind et al. Bioinformation 22(8): 5387-5391 (2026)
|
|
Edited by |
Vini Mehta
|
|
ISSN |
0973-2063
|
|
Publisher |
|
|
License |
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
|
|
|
|