|
Title |
Blue-M gel, barricaid and coe-pak as periodontal dressings: A randomized interventional study
|
|
Authors |
Rangoli Bhirad1,*, Sachin Malagi1, Priyamvada Bhatia2, Shikha Patel1, Amit Mihani1 & Shravani Bhole3
|
|
Affiliation |
1Department of Periodontology, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Anjora, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India; 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Anjora, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India; 3Department of Periodontics, People's College of Dental Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India; *Corresponding author
|
|
|
Rangoli Bhirad - E-mail: rangolibhirad1996@gmail.com
|
|
Article Type |
Research Article
|
|
Date |
Received September 1, 2026; Revised September 30, 2026; Accepted
September 30, 2026, Published September 30, 2026 |
|
Abstract |
Periodontal dressings protect surgical wounds and improve comfort, but evidence for bioactive Blue-M gel remains limited. This randomized study included 40 patients with Stage II–III Grade A periodontitis, equally assigned to four groups (n=10). Plaque Index, OHI-S, Gingival Index, Bleeding Index, Wound Healing Index and pain scores were assessed at baseline, 7 days and 3 months. Blue M showed greater reductions in plaque, inflammation and bleeding, faster healing (WHI: 4.8±0.42) and lower pain than conventional dressings. Thus, Blue-M gel may be an effective alternative to conventional periodontal dressings after flap surgery. |
|
Keywords |
Periodontal dressing, blue-m gel, barricade, coe-pak, wound healing, periodontal flap surgery, Kirkland flap
|
|
Citation |
Bhirad et al. Bioinformation 22(9): 5991-5994 (2026)
|
|
Edited by |
Ruby Singh
|
|
ISSN |
0973-2063
|
|
Publisher |
|
|
License |
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
|
|
|
|